By John Rogers:
There is a good chance that your golf clubs are too long. Over the past twenty years, golf club manufacturers have been making clubs stronger (meaning they have less loft on the face), and longer so that they can sell hopeful golfers the newest “hot” weapon that will knock the ball unimaginable distances. But when golfers arrive at the driving range with long clubs, what I see is a lot of people with poor posture, inefficient shaft angles, awkward or mismatched swing planes, off-center contact with the ball, unhelpful trajectory, little accuracy, and none of the distance the long clubs were supposed to provide. While it is generally thought that most beginners or high-handicappers get in trouble because they “come over the top”, the truth is that as many, or more, struggling golfers get the swing going too flat, deep, circular, or inside-out to effectively “get down” and compress the golf ball. And there is literally something standing between the average golfer and the changes that allow pure ball striking. It is his golf club. Even a “standard” length club can be too long for the average golfer to achieve the posture and swing positions that will help him hit pure golf shots. Having watched approximately 1 million swings in my fourteen years as a teaching professional, I have seen the many tendencies that cause golfers to struggle in their search for consistent ball striking. I have also seen hundreds of golfers who “top” or “pick” the ball benefit from the following: bending the spine forward more than they usually do, moving closer to the ball than they usually stand, creating slightly steeper planes during the swing, and learning to “trap” the ball with the center of the club-face (which generally produces more of a divot with the irons). But many golfers fail to find the needed setup and swing positions simply based on the equipment they use, even if they have been “fitted”, and even if they have “standard” clubs. It takes a shorter club for most people to create the desired spine and shaft angles, swing planes, and contact with the ball. As would be expected, the shorter club and improved planes create better accuracy with the golf shots. It surprises people, though, that they can actually hit the ball farther with these changes, mostly because of the quality of contact and the improved ability to pass energy from the club to the ball. A shorter club technically should improve control and accuracy. A longer club technically should increase distance. A club that is properly fitted in terms of the length of the shaft will maximize accuracy and distance. What I am saying is that the clubs most golfers are playing with, and even fitted for, are too long to maximize either; even when we call them “standard” in length. Comparing tour players to average players gives some anecdotal evidence. Notice that tour players look “big” compared to their clubs. Even with a longer iron, say a 4-iron, they seem to be standing “on top” of the ball, meaning the ball is not too far from their feet. Their spines are generally bent forward a fair amount, and the shaft of the club points at the belt-line, and often higher. The average player, on the other hand, looks like he is swinging a flag pole when he picks up a 4-iron. He stands almost vertical in his posture, the club reaching across two time zones to reach the distant ball, and the shaft points at his belt-line and sometimes lower (except for beginners, who tend to stand upright and reach their arms straight out, which raises the handle much higher at address). The results from these two setups are very different too. The tour player creates planes with his setup that allow him to attack the ball just steeply enough to create solid contact, high trajectory, tons of distance, and even some of that backspin that so many amateurs worship. The average player, with his upright posture and flat shaft angle, has an overly shallow attack on the ball that leads to “picked” shots, inconsistent trajectory, blocks, and hooks; unless he makes compensating moves at impact, in which case he will likely see fat shots, slices, and contact on the toe of the club. There are some aspects of tour swings that I do not encourage average golfers to emulate (such as the length of the arm-swings at the top), and some people cannot physically duplicate the posture and swings of elite players; but most weekend warriors would do well to copy the setup of the world’s best players, which might mean a club that makes them look “big”. For years, and with many average golfers, I have seen how the setup and then the swing can be made less effective by long clubs. Sometimes a shorter player who struggles to get the ball airborne can see dramatic results just by choking down on the club, bending over from the hips more, and moving closer to the ball. Unfortunately their friends, instructors, club-fitters, and club manufacturers try to get longer clubs in their hands so that they can supposedly hit the ball farther. The result is that these struggling golfers can hardly make contact at all, and even when they do, they learn a tortured swing that produces inconsistency rather than distance. Some more evidence that club length is overrated as a source of distance: In most sets of clubs, each iron is one-half inch shorter than the number below it. That is what creates the change in distance, right? Not really. Usually the clubs stop getting shorter above the 9-iron, meaning the various wedges are the same length as the 9-iron. And yet each wedge above the 9 hits the ball less far. Why? Because of the loft; the angle of the clubface has more to do with the change in distance from club to club than the length of the shaft. I recently read about a driver test carried out by a club-fitting company. They used a hitting machine to test a driver at a swing speed of 90 miles per hour, and made variations in the length of the driver from 42 to 46 inches. The distance gain when they added four inches to the shaft was a miserable 1.3 yards. And in human hands the 46-inch version of the driver will likely induce off-center contact with the ball, which makes it possible that the 42-inch driver would provide significantly greater distance from the tee. From a teacher’s perspective, I think over-length drivers are one of the worst things that ever happened to the swings of average golfers. Thank goodness the long shafts are attached to melon-sized clubheads with tons of forgiveness, because the swing planes that result from these long clubs make it nearly impossible for most golfers to hit the sweet spot. And the club is so disproportionately long compared to the rest of the set that it almost requires its own swing—which sometimes leads a golfer to foul up his swing with the other clubs in pursuit of monstrous tee shots. Sadly, the tendency for manufacturers to constantly make clubs longer and stronger has benefited their own club sales while making the game harder for many golfers. They can now sell everyone a gap wedge, which has the loft of a traditional pitching wedge, because the iron set has pulled so far away from the sand wedge in terms of loft that there is now a “gap” or missing club. And long irons tend to be hard enough for the average player to use, and now they are longer and stronger, and even harder to handle — but don’t worry, the club companies are glad to sell you replacement hybrids that cost twice as much as a traditional iron! Tour players, who play golf courses that are hundreds of yards longer than the courses we play, and play for millions of dollars, have drivers that average about 44 inches in length. If longer drivers helped them maximize their distance and accuracy, they would definitely use them. But they do not use them, and yet duffers with less ability insist on playing with the longer, more challenging clubs. Some club-fitters have come to the same conclusions that I have as a teaching professional. Tom Wishon, one of the top club designers in the world, said in his book The Search for the Perfect Golf Club, “Ninety-eight percent of men’s drivers these days are built to a “standard” length of 45 or 45.5 inches, and I am here to tell you that a 45-inch driver will not fit 90 percent of all golfers and will never allow them to achieve their best combination of distance AND accuracy.” This agrees completely with what I have seen on the driving range. Golf is a game of contradiction and oxymoron. Swinging easy seems to create power. We usually have to swing in the opposite of the direction we want the ball to travel. And in many cases, shorter sticks lead to longer shots. As Wishon said in his book, “It appears that, in the hands of real people…the shorter club might very well hit the ball not just with more accuracy, but farther as well.”
0 Comments
I had been looking at rangefinders for a while but didn’t want to spend upwards of $400 for a decent rangefinder. Well, one day my wife said she had a coworker that needed a recommendation for a rangefinder for her husband in the $200 or less price range. Now the search was on!!!. I remembered I had seen the TecTecTec VPRO500S Rangefinder online before and it had pretty good reviews and was a decent price, so I researched the TecTecTec VPRO500S Rangefinder for my wife’s friend. I thought the name of this rangefinder was a little strange, but if it performed well what’s in a name right? Although I was looking for some other lucky golfer, my requirements was that is had to be rainproof, measured up to at lest 500 yards +/- 1 yard with a slope option. TecTecTec VPRO500S fit the bill and also had other great options like Pinseeker mode which lets you measure overlapping targets, perfect for measuring the distance to the pin and wooded areas. It also has First Target Priority mode, which displays the distance of the closest subject, helpful when measuring the distance to the golf flag on a green with woods in the background and Scan mode, useful when checking the distance of hazards. I though at this price point this was a no brainer, So I recommended it. A month later, my wife and I were opening our Christmas gifts and guess what???? One of my gifts was the TecTecTec VPRO500S Rangefinder with slope! What a surprise. She later told me her friend wasn’t looking for a range finder for her husband but instead she was looking for a rangefinder for me. This rangefinder is great, it has become my constant companion on the course and on the range. The VPRO500S model is a great deal, all with a sub $200 price range. The TecTecTec model VPRO500 without slope is even cheaper. Let me know about other good rangefinders at good prices. |
Archives
April 2022
Categories |